Monday, December 31, 2012

Call of the Blood album reviewed (1995)

Original cover art by Alfred Sundvall

Dresden is Joseph Pryce and Knut Pedersen.

All songs by Joseph Pryce except Horst Wessell Song paraphrased by Joseph Pryce.

Dresden's new album, Call of the Blood, is a new kind of music for White people. Crafted with jewel-like care; with haunting, poetic lyrics; beautiful yet powerful arrangements and instrumentation; and soaring vocals; Call of the Blood combines the best elements of rock and traditional European music. Call of the Blood includes a lyric sheet to help you fully experience the impact of these new, masterfully written and produced songs. Call of the Blood will open a gateway in the minds of Aryan youth to a new and brighter future. – Kevin Alfred Strom

Dedicated to the memory of Ludwig Klages

[For a download link, click on the song-title above the player.]


Raise up the flag, and stand as one, together.
Our troops will march with steady, iron tread.
Though comrades fall, shot down by leftists and Reaction,
They march with us in spirit to the fight.
Clear off the streets, the Brown Battalion marches!
The streets are free – the Brown Battalions rule.
The sacred flag brings hope to our oppressed millions;
The day for freedom and for bread is here.
At last the call to struggle rings out loudly – And we're prepared: we storm into the fight!
As Hitler's flag is waving proudly in the bright skies,
Our slavery ends forever in this land!

Heart sublime and will so pure,
Since your passing we are sure
That you light the way
To a shining day.
So much courage in your heart.
Gave your life that truth might start
On her stellar quest.
George, you passed the test.
What makes a man give his life for his race?
They'd have us vanish from Earth without trace,
But you wait in the wings for the moment of our call.
GLR, now the tide is advancing,
But we'll all hold the line
And rise as one, in the sun.
GLR, spare us some of your spirit,
For our victory is nigh,
And you are here, like a god.
George Lincoln Rockwell, come back and save us....
AVATAR (Adolf Hitler)

Aryan Sun, shine down on the land;
From icy mountains to margin of sand.
We've dreamed a dream of what must be – so open your mind and heaven you'll see.
One people, one blood-community
In roaring forests and on the sea;
The warrior's oath, the mother's smile – soft winds on meadows, mile by mile.
And He is there, behind it all:
Purest Idea, commanding Call.
The fire of His Mind, the blazing eyes,
Gift of the Gods, from bluest skies.
Aryan Sun, shine down on the land;
From icy mountains to margin of sand.
We've dreamed a dream of what must be – so open your mind, His heaven you'll see....

Jefferson, John C. Calhoun: where did you go, wherever did you go?
Washington, and Franklin too, where did you go, wherever did you go?
America, I miss you, miss you: I want to come back home.
America, I need to see you, I need to come back home.
Edgar Poe and Mencken, love you so, I wanted you to know.
Ambrose Bierce, and Dr. Pierce – love you so, I wanted you to know.
Arya, Arya, Savitri Devi,
Shine like a star....
Get the monkey who's paid to sing, to get a monkey to bear the ring2;
Get the stars 'cause they're sure to bring cash to ransom a captured king.
Do you have no shame? Who will take the blame?
It's the aliens' turn to be driven into the foaming sea.
We will rise and we'll do much more, 'til we're victors from shore to shore.
Then we'll stage some trials.
Gibbets3 stretch for miles.
America, I miss you....

We're on the march today to Whidbey Island; we've found a reason to live today, on Whidbey Island.
Maybe, now we know just why this young man had to die.
He saw the gleaming dawn; he asked the question.
We follow him where he's led, O Northern Bastion.
Our people must not die; we'll never live a lie.
We've built our fires tonight on Whidbey Island.
The flames will rise and rise from Whidbey Island.
And then the world will know, how from a spark the flames will grow.
O Whidbey Island.

Slay, slay the dragon: go, go for, go for the throat.
ZOG has me in its power walking on the brink.
ZOG tells me what to do and everything I think.
ZOG – I awake at night and ZOG is at the door;
ZOG – I would free myself, I'm living like a whore.
How can you live with this evil?
The tune's been called by the devil.
How fares your soul, little citizen?
Get off your knees, little citizen!
ZOG – I'm awake and yet I'm walking in my sleep.
ZOG – There's a precipice my steps now seem to seek.
ZOG – Turn around there is a monster just behind.
ZOG – And he's tearing out my will, my heart, my mind.
For blood and for soil, we will work, we will toil;
Heaven is born on the Earth.
The heroes arise as we shout to the skies:
We will now have our rebirth!
DESOLATION ROW (To Robert Miles)

You see the smiles you see the bright eyes
You hear the laughter reach up to the skies
For though we are down, we're not defeated
On Desolation Row
And as we stand by the fire,
We watch the flames mounting ever higher
And if you steel your heart
The world will mark its change
Every element rearrange.
Though we must all suffer fools,
Yet we must never suffer gladly
And if you cannot stand with us,
Then stand aside – the gates of paradise open wide....
Gods tumble down as the new world reveals its visage
And though the flowers droop sometimes, we soothe our minds
When winter comes, spring is close behind.
Let the old fools make their deals.
Let the old world prepare its exit.
We're waiting in the wings right now to show you how
A real live Hamlet can take a bow.

Chill winds in the winterland;
Blue ice, red fire.
Dark queen of my decadence, quench my desire.

Though you walk by the sea of oblivion,
keep your eyes on the temples of light.
Bear your torch high in front
of the wavering crowd.
In your hands is the doom of the night.
For many are called, but so few are chosen;
you must find the gods we have lost, or never found.
Too many have wandered afar from the Northland,
you must heed the Call of the Blood.
What my eyes witness now in a prostrate world calls new strength to the Call of the Blood.
Nordic honor and dignity flee the Dark, and we're menaced by uprising floods.
Close the ranks, day is dawning throughout the land; the invisible web is now thrown.
Seize the monsters and drive them back whence they came,
To the womb of the Eternal Unknown.
1. Ariadne: In Greek mythology, the daughter of Minos and Pasiphae, who gave Theseus the thread by which he found his way out of the Labyrinth.
2. Michael Jackson at Elizabeth Taylor's wedding.
3. A reference to The Day of the Rope. See the novel The Turner Diaries by Andrew MacDonald
4. "Zionist Occupation Government"
Original cover painting by Alfred Sundvall

THE STORMER (Julius Streicher1)

Take the mask off, let's see what is inside.
Plastic demon2, let's see what you would hide.
Manila envelope comes to my door, watching me, watching me crawl on the floor.
Juli can tell me the truth if I want, and he'll perform any trick, any stunt.
I won't trust any old fox on the heath; I won't give dirty DSJs3 my seat.
I wouldn't trust Mr. Suess on his oath: Juli has told me, "Watch out for them both!"
ARYANS: We know we fear you, you tell me – KIKES: Impossible!
ARYANS: We would avoid you, you tell me – KIKES: Impossible!
ARYANS: Can we avoid you? You tell me – KIKES: Impossible!
ARYANS: But we'll destroy you and then you must – 
Juli, they beat you4, they f---ed with your pride.
Moulies abused you with mouths opened wide.
Yet you returned in a plain-paper bag, taller and whiter than
Snow-covered crag.

A four and a half year struggle against lies, stupidity, and cowardice.5 A reckoning.
(Who's afraid of Mr. Wolf? Who's afraid to wage a war?)
INSTAURATION (To Wilmot Robertson)

Instauration... meditation... Aryan nation...
When will our folk be free?
Dragon boats sail... enemies pale... Victory hail... Dragon boats sail...
Soon will our Folk be free.
In the Northland... We will gather... evolution... near the glaciers...
Now will our Gods be free.
TRYST (Danger in Central Park)

As they strolled through the park near the flashing of the fountains,
the full moon shed its light on the lovers as they walked.
Sweet was the nighttime to the dreamers; warm is the feeling of new love.
But there's a shadow moving swiftly through the darkness –
And they are not protected, and they won't see the day.
Danger in Central Park, Zooland, USA, where the primates kill and feast each and every day.
Sad, o so sad, but no one complains;
Bad, very bad, they should all be in chains.
There's the crunch of the leaves as the killer moves in closer;
but they don't seem to hear as he moves toward their tryst.
Sweet was the nighttime to the dreamers; warm is the gushing of their blood.
Stranger, you must shed a tear for our poor lovers –
For they were not protected, and did not see the day....

Big belly bourgeois he sends me my check
And if he don't I will narrow his neck
For I have emerged in the land of the free
With dope for your kids and much money for me
I'll never go – I'm nailed down you know
I'll stay 'til the trumpets of doom.
Your streets are gold; they're bought and they're sold;
Get out of my way, just make room!
I like to party in de daytime
I like to party in de nighttime
When I wake up I say as I start the new day
"I'm so glad that I came to America!"The living is free and my family's with me
I'm so glad that I'll never go home.
"Give me your lazy, your botched, and your whores"--
That's what you say as we land on your shores.
You are a milk-cow with millions of teats
We got the mouths and we sure got the wits.
We'll never go – we're nailed down you know;
We'll stay in these well-furnished rooms.
Your streets are gold, they're bought and they're sold;
Get out of our way; we're your doom!
THRENODY (to The Leader)

Walking on a road of fate with head held high
We've another sorrow.
And since his flame of life was quenched we dread the day –
Dread each sad tomorrow.
So in the dark we huddle close in friendship's glow,
Guardians of the Order.
And those who rave and fume like monsters in the gloom
Will receive no quarter.
What are we coming to?
What did he ask of you? – of me?
Now, it is a darkling time
And it's late, very late, very late.
Pass into a cosmic circle of fate
Not too late, not too late,
For those who train their questing souls for the Day.
And as we gather in the sacred little rooms
We are in His presence.
We chant the chants and feel the roar of Viking blood
Gathered from His essence.
For we must halt the steep decline of humankind.
Raise the banner high!
We believe that we will fight the final fight
Under Nordic skies.
TOYS (George's Weapons)

(They called George Bush a sissy, so to increase his popularity ratings and to please his Jewish masters, he rained fire down upon the people of Iraq.)

I dream of White Amerika, aglow with strength and beauty,
Where children ramble unafraid and free.
Our women bring forth noble sons to build a world of glory.
And daughters weave their magic spells.
One day....
I want to live in a White Amerika
I'll find my fate in a White Imperium.
Smash the system – Off with their heads.
1. National Socialist official and publisher, ritually murdered for his writings by Jews in 1946.
2. Composer Richard Wagner's term for the Jew.
3. "Department Store Jewess"
4. Streicher was tortured by Negroes at Nuremberg.
5. This sentence was the original title of Mein Kampf.

Dr. Pierce with his old friend Hans Schmidt

One of the last National Alliance meetings Dr. Pierce attended before his untimely death in July, 2002, was in February of that year down in North Georgia at Chester Doles' National Alliance Local Unit's headquarters building which Chester and other Alliance built for the purpose of holding their regular meetings.

Mr. Doles' Local Unit was broken up when federal authorities sent him off to prison on a trumped up weapons possession charge soon after Dr. Pierce's death. More here:

Hans Schmidt was a long time friend of Dr. Pierce's. For years, well into the 1990s, Dr. Pierce's primary transportation while living in West Virginia was a 1972 Opel Kadett station wagon that Mr. Schmidt had given to him after it could no longer pass the stringent emissions standards for the Washington, DC, area.

Mr. Schmidt, who was chairman of the German American National Political Action Committee (GAN-PAC), died in 2010, but not before authoring several books, all available at Here are a couple of interesting Amazon reviews of his last book:

5.0 out of 5 stars Should be required reading June 6, 2010
This book is unique in that it is a response to an opposing book written by a boyhood friend of the author. To me, that makes it potentially a very effective way to teach people critical-thinking skills. Get this book, than get Bruno Manz's book and read both of them. Make your own decision on who is more concerned with actual truth. Normally people never do this, but there is no better way to open your eyes. I have done this more than anyone I have ever known and there is much we can learn from books like these. I think we can certainly learn more than we learn from constantly hearing better and better (read "more extreme") versions of the official view of WW2. That's not thinking, that's training. History really is written by the victors. You can see that clearly just from reading this book.

This book is so interesting, unique and eye-opening that it should be read in high schools so people can look at the War from other perspectives. You cannot discount what he is saying just because some of it is politically incorrect. He includes examples and quotes from everyone from Julius Streicher to Elie Wiesel. He also does a lot of what I call "psychological archaeology" -- where he shows that Germans were most definitely not evil or irrational. In fact, they appear to have been much more reasonable and rational than most people today. We are all subject to propaganda -- which sinks into us because of what we see as a "respectable" opinion more than from the actual arguments. Most people only later come up with rationalizations for their views, not really ever knowing where those views came from. Social conditioning can shape your brain completely, and you will never learn to really think without reading books like these which show where the opinions you have originate.. There are not many books like this out there. This book definitely made my mind more free. Its better than any self-help book I ever read in that regard. It allows you to really think rather than just producing well-trained responses. Exercise your freedom of speech and read it. An amazing book by an amazing man -- a real piece of history. It is a shame that it is out of print and so expensive now. I still think it is worth it at 100.00. It is that good.

5.0 out of 5 stars Schmidt Has Done It Again! July 11, 2006
After reading Hans Schmidt's previous two books (Jailed in 'Democratic' Germany, and SS Panzergrenadier) I have come to love the author and his works. His style is so unique. He uses such great examples to really illustrate his point, and his books are real eye openers. This latest one is no different. Again, I was enthralled from first page to last, and I learned so much on a topic that is usually either distorted or suppressed. Hats off to Waffen-SS veteran Hans Schmidt! He is a symbol of courage and truth in a world in which cowardice and lies dominate.

Friday, November 30, 2012

Dividing the Race


Dividing the Race

When it was cited by Niccolo Machiavelli early in the 16th century, it already was a strategy which the enemies of our people have used successfully against us more than once, and it is the strategy which is responsible for our present peril.

Surprisingly, the division of our people is widely discussed in front of us by the enemies who have accomplished it, although the discussions are heavily laden with disingenuousness: the heterosexual White male, they gloat, has been dispossessed; his power has been taken by minorities and women, and there is nothing he can do about it except learn to live with the fait accompli.

Actually, it's not that simple. The division itself is far more complicated than heterosexual White males on one side and Jews, homosexuals, Blacks, Asians, mestizos, and women on the other. The most important complication is that many White women, probably a majority, are on the side of their men; and many heterosexual White males have joined the other side. Furthermore, there is much which can be done about the situation.

The division we would like to see, of course, is all heterosexual White men and women on one side and all Jews homosexuals, Blacks Asians, and mestizos on the other. Then we would be ready for the shooting to start, and we would settle matters pretty quickly. The Jews understand that, and that is why their efforts have been directed not only at empowering the non-Whites and the perverts but also toward alienating as many White men and women from their own race as possible.

I remember talking to groups of White college students 25 years ago and pointing out to them where the "civil rights" agitation, which even then had become quite fashionable on campuses, was heading. I told them that it would lead to the decline of our morals and our culture, the disintegration of our society, and finally to a race war between Whites and Blacks in America. Most of the students just listened without noticeable reaction, as if they were watching another television program. Only a small minority expressed either a favorable or unfavorable response. Nearly all of the former were males: unfortunately, many of them males with a low testosterone level, who crept up to me quietly afterward and expressed their approval when no one else was around to hear them.

Both males and females were among my vocal opponents, but I was always sad to note that the girls tended to be more numerous and more hostile than the boys. After a talk I gave at the University of Maryland, one White girl proudly, " Well, if there's a race war between Whites and Blacks, I'll be shooting at you from the Black side."

I spoke to a class of seniors at a private high school, also in Maryland, and while the teacher smirked in the back of the class a blonde girl in the front row sat next to the only Black male in the class and kissed and fondled him throughout my talk, in an obviously prearranged effort to disconcert me.

Women are much more fashion conscious than men. Of course, there are men, even heterosexual men, who worry very much about wearing the latest style in cuff links or ties, but women have always been far ahead of them in such matters, far more easily persuaded that they absolutely had to buy new wardrobes every time the fashion moguls raised or lowered hems an inch.

The Jews, to their credit, understood before the rest of us that the female tendency to be a slave to fashion is an innate, sex-linked characteristic, and they also realized that ideological fashions could bind women as strongly as fashions in dress and ornament. It's no coincidence that nearly all of the influential gurus and heroines of feminism of the past half-century have been Jewesses: Betty Friedan, Bella Abzug, Andrea Dworkin, Shulamith Firestone, Lucy Komisar, Lynda Schor, Gloria Steinem, ad nauseam.

Thus, the arbiters of fashion in Hollywood and New York who used the cinema and television to make racial mixing fashionable among the trendy set also made feminism fashionable among White women. The madness has gone so far today that substantial numbers of otherwise normal, heterosexual White women have let themselves be persuaded that not only can they be just as capable combat pilots or firefighters as men but that only women really know how to give women sexual fulfillment.

Fortunately, most of them have not yet brought practice into line with that doctrine, but they have managed to make themselves thoroughly neurotic trying to reconcile doctrine with instinct. More relevant to the matter under discussion here, many women have let themselves be maneuvered into a position where they view any assault on the currently fashionable ideology of racial equality as an assault on their "right" as women to be military school cadets or corporate raiders. These women have a subconscious understanding that this "right" is just as artificial as the "equality" claimed by non-Whites and homosexuals, and they have accepted these others as their allies in fending off the efforts of heterosexual White males to drag them out of the cockpit and the boardroom and put them back into the kitchen, the bedroom, and the nursery. They have bought the Jewish argument that heterosexual White males should be regarded with suspicion until the latter have demonstrated their "sensitivity."

Unfortunately, all too many men have done just that. Men may not be quite as trendy as women, on the average, but that's not saying much for them. The difference is a matter of degree, not kind. There are all too many men who are as afraid of having a Politically Incorrect idea in their heads as the average woman is of being caught in unfashionable attire: if "sensitivity" is "in," they gladly will put on the most disgusting display of it. And there are men who simply have no ideas in their heads except getting ahead. Unlike the "sensitive" ones, they have no shortage of testosterone, but they also have no sense of responsibility or propriety: they will ally themselves to whatever faction seems to offer them the best career prospects, and they will pay lip service to the corresponding ideology. Like the feminists, they will regard any other man who tries to rock the boat they are in as the enemy.

...[W]e may find ourselves allied with many people whom in the past we barely tolerated: the religious zealots of the Christian right, the essentially conservative types, [etc.]...

Actually, that's too stark a picture. Most people, on both sides, are not really partisans. They're just spectators, who find themselves, by accident more than by choice, in one camp or the other, and they sing along with the crowd without really thinking about the meaning of the words.

That makes the division no less real and no less dangerous for us, however. If looking at the great, passive middle tends to blur the division, it is sharp enough at the extremes, where there is passion aplenty: passion most often expressed as hate.

In the trendier circles of Washington, D.C., and other large, eastern cities, there is more bigotry than there ever was in a Ku Klux Klan klavern. It may be that back in the 1930s some of the more backward Klansmen didn't like Catholics or foreigners (although the Klan since has had the good sense to drop those divisions), but that's nothing compared to what the Politically Correct bigots in Washington don't like today.

Walk into one of their cocktail parties wearing a National Rifle Association button, and the conversation will freeze as suddenly as it would if Nelson Mandela showed up at a Klan picnic. If you speak with a rural accent, you will be regarded with immediate suspicion. If you are from the South, then you'll be expected to prove that it's only the "New" South of Jews, Blacks, and Politically Correct yuppies with which you have any connections. If you're especially "Aryan-looking" (a la Rutger Hauer or Darryl Hannah, for example), you can deflect hostility by coming with a Black date.

In these circles the word "White," used as a racial designation, evokes instant fear and loathing, especially among the Whites. They usually won't admit their hatred of their own kind to nontrendies, but among themselves they are quite open about it. They all agree that it is a good thing that North America is becoming darker, and they look forward eagerly to the day when the continent will have a non-White majority. Things will be much better then, they all aver: the greatest evil on the planet, White racism, finally will be suppressed, and love and brotherhood will reign.

When they watch a cowboys-and-Indians movie, they always root for the Indians: when a White is scalped or tied to a stake to be burned, they cheer. Reading The Turner Diaries, or any book in which the Whites win, "sickens" them, (to borrow the word most often used by mainstream journalists to describe their reaction to my novel in the reviews they wrote of it following the Oklahoma City bombing). Viewing Leni Riefenstahl's Triumph of the Will, with its magnificent portrayal of proud, racially conscious White men and women, is a "chilling" experience, they say, even though it was made by the greatest woman cinematic genius.

Their dream world is one high in melanin and low in testosterone. It is a world where strong women, wearing trousers and holding the key executive positions, share power with Blacks, Jews, and other non-Whites, and everyone lives in a city much like New York. Everything will be run by committees, and problems will be solved by talking them to death. White males will be tolerated in subservient positions, if they are either homosexual or have been "sensitized." This picture of the world is one which has been drilled into them during the past 30 years, starting at puberty with MTV and Politically Correct comic books.

They tend to fall into the mistaken belief that they are the universe, because they live inside a media-generated illusion-world and talk only with each other. But they do chatter in nervous fright whenever they are reminded that there are some of those awful heterosexual White males left out there who haven't been sensitized yet. They look to the government to protect them from this threat and maintain their empowerment, and they are hot to have the government use whatever measures are expedient for that purpose. In particular, they want a roundup of guns and a clampdown on Politically Incorrect speech.

Then there's our side of the division. Close to the middle are those White men and women who still believe that the traditional family, with a male breadwinner and protector and a female homemaker, is not only worth saving, but that it's the natural way for men and women to live and by far the best way to raise emotionally and spiritually healthy children.

Unfortunately, the changes in American society during the past half century or so have made the traditional family an endangered species. In 1940 most married women were full-time homemakers. Between 1940 and 1990 the portion of married women working outside the home increased by a factor of four, to approximately 60 percent. More than half of married mothers with children under 17 years of age are now employed full time outside the home, and the percentage rises every year.

This change has not been entirely a matter of choice: increasing urbanization of the economy, with jobs moving from rural to urban areas, and the rising cost of housing relative to per capita income have made it much more difficult to maintain a family on one income. Greatly exacerbating the situation, however, has been a trend in lifestyles toward ever greater consumption. People on both sides of the division have let themselves be persuaded that they cannot live without many things that their grandparents found quite unnecessary.

Close to the middle are those White men and women who still believe
that the traditional family, with a male breadwinner and protector and
a female homemaker, is not only worth saving, but that it's the natural way
for men and women to live and by far the best way to raise
emotionally and spiritually healthy children.
The division at the middle, then, is not between people who are members of traditional families on our side and those with working wives and mothers on the other. Rather, it is between those who would live in traditional families if they could, and those who regard traditional families as old-fashioned and repressive and look on the present trend with favor.
Looking at the division from a different viewpoint, those near the middle on our side are those who value freedom above comfort and security, while the converse is true for those on the other side. The herd instinct is a little weaker on our side than on theirs. They have a near monopoly on authoritarian personalities: on people who like to speak with reverence of “our President” and “our government” and to hate anyone who lacks their reverence.
We look to ourselves to satisfy our needs; they look to the government. We also tend to live more in tune with our instincts-more the way God intended us to live, the Christians on our side would say-while the others favor life-styles as artificial as their politics.
As we move further away from the middle, the passion becomes stronger. Trendy people-people who always want to do only what everyone else is doing and would never dream of striking out in a new direction, away from the crowd, or trying something they hadn't seen on television-feel comfortable with lots of rules and regulations. Things that aren't regulated by the government make them nervous. They like to buy licenses and apply for permits and pay fees and be told just what's permissible and what isn't. It's like having a stamp of assurance from the government that what they're doing is fashionable, or at least acceptable.
They cannot imagine the feeling of rage and resentment that rises in people with a more independent or adventurous nature when the latter are confronted with one of these artificial government barriers. Here's an example: When I was a kid I loved fireworks. I could go to a fireworks store and buy whatever I wanted. I could ride my bicycle to a vacant lot and set off my firecrackers and bottle rockets without violating any laws. Today there are very few places left in the United States where kids can do that. Certainly, there always were inept dolts who managed to blow off a finger or lose an eye playing with fireworks, just as there are people who will manage to shoot themselves or a member of the family by accident if they get their hands on a gun. We used to be willing to accept such risks. We were aware that if you're not careful you can hurt yourself. We understood that living was an inherently dangerous business. We preferred a world in which there were freedom and risks to a supposedly safer world walled in by rules.
By the time I was 12 years old or so, I had developed a more serious interest in rockets and related matters than store-bought fireworks could satisfy. I used to take the money I made mowing lawns in Dallas, Texas, and get an adult to give me a ride downtown to Greene Brothers, the big laboratory supply warehouse, where I would give a clerk the list of chemicals and glassware I wanted, and then I would walk through the warehouse with him while he found the items for me on the shelves. A dollar would buy more nitric acid or powdered aluminum in those days than it will today. The important thing , though, was that I didn't have to fill out any forms or show the clerk a permit from the government to buy what I wanted.
Pyrotechnics isn't everyone's thing, of course, but the same thicket of government restrictions has overgrown nearly every activity that's not on the beaten path: flying your own airplane, building your own house, collecting your own firearms, operating your own business. It can't be that the government is trying to protect us with its restrictions: it still pays farmers to grow an addictive drug which causes the deaths of 400,000 cigarette smokers in the United States every year. Whatever the government's reason, it is infuriating to plenty of people besides me.
I live in one of those rare, backwoodsy places where there are no building codes, and a property owner doesn't have to ask city hall for permission to dig a hole in his backyard or change his plumbing around. He just does it, and it's nobody's business but his. The trendier locals are trying to change that. They believe that building codes are “progressive” or something of the sort, and they want to have the same sort of rules that property owners in Philadelphia and New York have. Fortunately, there are plenty of other folks like me around here who are resisting, but the trendies are looking for allies in the state government. People who live in New York just wouldn't understand, but there are those of us who really get steamed about such things.
It used to be that men valued their personal honor above all other things, and governments understood and accommodated themselves to their citizens' sense of honor, albeit reluctantly in many cases. That was a long time ago, of course. Even some politicians had a sense of personal honor. (That was a very long time ago.)
It used to be that men valued their personal honor above
all other things, and government understood and accommodated
themselves to their citizens' sense of honor...
In those olden days, if a man were in public with his wife, and a stranger made a lewd remark to her or put his hands on her, the offender could count on having to defend his life. If the husband killed or seriously injured him, and there were witnesses to the original offense, the husband would have been justified in his actions, in the eyes of his peers and of the government. Similar considerations applied if the original offense were against the husband himself. The corollary to this was that people tended to be more polite in public, more careful not to give offense.
How different it is today! The feminists become infuriated at the mere suggestion that a man should feel any obligation to protect a woman. Protection suggests a sense of possession. Protection is a job for the government, not for individual men. And the Jews, who always have regarded with a sneering sort of amusement and disbelief the Aryans' willingness to fight for the sake of honor, have joined the feminists in moving us all into a more enlightened era, where honor counts for nothing.
There are, of course, a few of us whose hearts are still back in the Stone Age. We may control ourselves most of the time. We may swallow insults and other offenses without reprisal, just to stay out of jail; but when we do, we feel dishonored, and when we feel dishonored a feeling of hatred begins building in us: hatred against the government which forced us to dishonor ourselves, hatred against the politicians and the bureaucrats and the other supporters of the government.
I am acquainted with the details of a recent case in which a White man and his wife were insulted in a mall parking lot by a Black who had nearly hit their car with his. After screaming his insults about White “crackers” and “honkies” and being told in turn that he and his fellow “niggers” should go back to Africa, the Black drove off, then came back a few minutes later with a Black friend and a brick. Advancing on foot with the brick in hand toward the car in which the White man and his wife were sitting, the Black screamed at the White man, “I'm gonna smash your motherf-ing head in.” Whereupon, the White man tore open his glove compartment, grabbed a pistol, and shot the Black dead.
During the subsequent trial, both the defense and prosecution witnesses agreed that the Black had threatened to smash the White man's head with a brick. The only difference in the testimony was that the prosecution's witnesses-the Black's male friend and a White woman-said that the Black dropped his brick and took a couple of steps backward just before he was shot, while the defense said that the Black still was holding the brick when the White man fired. The key to the outcome of the trial, however, was that the prosecution emphasized that the White man, who was a university graduate with a good job and a stable marriage, happened to be a “racist,” who didn't believe that Blacks should be permitted to remain in America. The Jewish prosecutor read excerpts to the court from Politically Incorrect books and letters seized from the White couple's home.
The mostly White jury, showing to the world that it had no sympathy for White “racists,” brought in a Politically Correct verdict of guilty of premeditated murder, and the White judge sentenced the White man to life in prison. Such an egregious injustice may be considered only a fluke by some-the consequence of an unlucky combination of a “sensitive” jury, a Jewish prosecutor, a politically ambitious judge, and an inept defense lawyer-but those who pay attention to such matters can cite a hundred similar cases from recent years.
The Jews, the feminists, and their collaborators would like to lock up all of us Stone Age men, who would rather fight than crawl. Our presence makes them uncomfortable. And so they have perverted the “justice” system to serve their purpose. And they're getting away with it.
Or are they? Every time they have a success of the sort cited above, every time they gloat and smirk publicly about such a victory over heterosexual White males, the hatred against them builds, the burning desire to tear out their throats and smash their heads grows.
Which brings us back to sex again. Heterosexual White males who used to know instinctively what to do when a Black attacked them with a brick also used to know instinctively how to behave when they wanted a mate-or even the temporary company of a woman. The changing of all the rules to suit feminist and Jewish notions of “equality” has confused many of them.
Most of us, to be sure, have learned to adapt. Whether we liked it or not, we learned the new etiquette. We also learned that there still are old-fashioned, unreconstructed women to be found-feminine rather than feminist women-if one knows where to look for them. But they definitely are scarcer than they used to be, and the fellows who have a harder time adapting to unnatural conditions have suffered accordingly. There's hardly anything to make a man angrier than depriving him of a woman's company for an extended period.
So here's what it all boils down to: the war between the Clinton constituency and the rest of us heating up. Astute observers have been commenting for years on the “culture war” raging in America. It was a war between those on one side who believe that children should be raised in a disciplined environment and have old-fashioned values instilled in them, and those on the other side who believe that all any child needs is a big dose of “multiculturalism” via MTV every day.
The folks on the old-fashioned side were fighting with one hand tied behind their backs, though, because they were careful never to admit even to themselves that the “culture war” is really a race war: that what makes MTV so elementally evil is that it is Jewish, that it is the fiendishly crafted instrument of the sinister Jewish billionaire Sumner Redstone. They railed against “multiculturalism,” but they retreated in embarrassment when the multiculturalists charged them with “racism.”
So obviously the Clintonistas were winning, and the rest of us were losing. One easy triumph after another caused the Clinton constituency to throw caution to the winds and to push ahead more rapidly and more brazenly. Homosexuals, radical feminists, and Blacks were brought into more policy-making positions in the government than ever before. Jews came out from behind the scenes and assumed more visible positions of power: on the Supreme Court, in the Cabinet, and as movers and shakers in the Congress. Military leaders who were considered insufficiently “sensitive” were canned.
The Jews defined a new category of crime-”hate crime”-and got the government to go along. The Politically Correct elitists announced that the Constitution is obsolete, and the government decided to prove it by making bloody examples of dissidents, first shooting in cold blood the wife and child of a White separatist at Ruby Ridge and then burning to death nearly a hundred Second Amendment dissidents at Waco.
All of this became a mite too much for us unsensitized heterosexual White males. We decided to make ourselves heard, and we began speaking out more loudly than before. We began using the Internet, and we began making radio broadcasts on those few stations not yet under Jewish control. And a few crazies among us did some wild and stupid things: shooting abortion doctors, bombing a government building, shooting up the White House.
The Clinton constituency responded by announcing the need to silence dissident voices: specifically, to keep Politically Incorrect messages off the Internet and Politically Incorrect radio programs off the airwaves.
Actually, this response was only the unveiling of a small part of a scheme on which they had been laboring for years. The Jews want in the United States the same sort of laws they had succeeded in forcing on the populations of Canada, the United Kingdom, Germany, Switzerland, Belgium, Denmark, and a dozen other White countries, where it is now illegal for Whites to dispute the Jewish version of history or to criticize Jewish efforts to “multiculturalize” their people. They had succeeded in introducing codes of Politically Correct expression at most universities, in many of the larger corporations, and in the government itself, but they were still wondering how they could put real teeth into these codes by criminalizing what they cleverly refer to as “hate speech” when the Oklahoma City bombers presented them with a golden opportunity. Now they're trying to make the most of it.
It remains to be seen how successful they will be. If they do succeed even partly in their efforts to scuttle the Bill of Rights-even if all they're able to do is knock another brick or two out of the Second Amendment and close down a few Politically Incorrect broadcasters-I believe they'll get a response from us Stone Age types which will make everything which has happened so far seem like a church social.
And I believe that they will be at least that successful. Certainly, free speech has never been truly popular. Joe and Jill Sixpack have never understood why anyone should be permitted to write or say things that offend conventional people. During the 1960s, when the Jews were offending a great many conventional people through their “counterculture” campaign, the freedom to shout obscenities and preach treason was zealously promoted by their trendy collaborators in the cultural, academic, and media establishments. That era is far behind us now, however, and the same trendy collaborators are warning everyone that we really must outlaw “hate speech.”
That'll be another step for them in the division of our people. Many people on our side who're near the middle now will be pulled far out toward the extreme. This radicalization will make us stronger.
The authoritarian types will remain where they are for the most part, on the other side near the middle, supporting “our President” and “our government” as self-righteously as ever. About the only ones we can expect to cross over to us in substantial numbers are those whose oxen are gored by changes. Fortunately, more and more oxen will be gored, as the Jews rush to cram everything they can down our throats while they still have a grip on the situation.
In particular, their continuing drive to usher in the New World Order as soon as possible, with its attendant deindustrialization of America and the proletarianization of the White middle class, will force many to take a position with us who would have preferred to remain squarely on the fence. We should be thankful that the Jews' campaign for the division and destruction of our people is committed to a number of fronts simultaneously, and they cannot easily pull back on one while pushing forward on another.
Thus, even as the division of our people continues, new unions will be formed.
By the time the shooting begins in earnest things almost certainly
will not be divided along the lines we would prefer. What we must strive
for now is to ensure that those on our side of the division will
be able to win.
In our effort to defeat their campaign we may find ourselves allied with many people whom in the past we barely tolerated: the religious zealots of the Christian right, the essentially conservative types who have been gravitating toward the militias, the wild and undisciplined young White people in our cities who had nowhere to turn but to the skinhead movement when they were abandoned by our “multicultural” society, libertarians who finally are waking up to the fact that if they are to preserve any liberty at all they may have to compromise their individualism temporarily, perhaps even a few authoritarians from the military and police establishments who have overdosed on Clintonism.
Thus, even as the division of our people continues, new unions will be formed. By the time the shooting begins in earnest things almost certainly will not be divided along the lines we would prefer. What we must strive for now is to ensure that those on our side of the division will be able to win.

Wednesday, November 28, 2012

How Israel Gets a Free Lunch

From National Vanguard magazine, Issue No 104, March-April 1985:
How Israel Gets a Free Lunch

Thy gates shall be open continually...that men may bring unto thee the wealth of the Gentiles...
--Isaiah 60:11

Jews are ingenious people, especially where money is concerned, and their financial ingenuity is nowhere more evident than in Israel. Consider: Whenever the Israeli government runs low on money (which is all the time), the minister of finance merely turns on the printing presses and prints as many more shekels as the government needs. No other government in the world is clever enough to finance itself in such an easy way.

Of course, there are a few little kinks in the Israeli method; for one thing, it causes an astronomical inflation, which has been bouncing around between a 400 per cent and 1,300 per cent annual rate for the past couple of years. In April the rate was 740 per cent.

The Israeli government has tried other methods of paying its bills: income taxes, for example. But Israel is a nation of tax evaders, and they are so clever at concealing income and assets that not even Jewish tax collectors have had much luck at making them pay what they owe. Nevertheless, the Israeli treasury is able to keep 400,000 government employees on the payroll; that's 30 per cent of the 1.34 million-strong Israeli workforce, a much higher proportion of government employees than in any other country on this side of the Iron Curtain.

Israel has the largest per capita foreign debt of any nation, by far; and also the world's largest per capita trade deficit: currently more than $5 billion per year.

Everyone agrees that the Israeli economy is an unmitigated disaster. And yet... the Israeli standard of living continues to rise; it climbed another 6 per cent in 1984. Despite the staggering inflation and trade deficit, Israelis are on a buying binge: home appliances, luxury automobiles, jewelry, foreign travel.

When inflation soars in Canada, Germany, the United States, or Poland -- when one of those countries cannot export enough of its goods to pay for what it must import -- then the people suffer; they must pull in their belts, reduce their consumption, and work harder in order to survive.

Why is it different for Israel? How are the Jews able to defy all the laws of economics with impunity?
...[T]he divinely ordained function of the Gentiles (goyim) is to provide wealth for the Jews.
The answer is no secret at all: Israelis are getting a free lunch, because they have persuaded the Gentile world to pick up the tab for them. Hymie Goldblatt in Tel Aviv is able to buy himself a new Mercedes and take his family on a vacation abroad, because Dick Smith's family in Kansas City is coughing up the tax money to pay for those things. 

The Israelis are receiving $3.4 billion from the U.S. Treasury this year: $1.4 billion in military aid, $1.2 billion in "regular" economic aid, and a "special" $800 million economic aid supplement. That's all in outright gifts, not loans. In addition, American Jews are sending over another $1.5 billion in tax exempt personal donations, which effectively robs the U.S. Treasury of $700 billion in lost taxes. It all adds up to about a $5,000 annual bonus per Israeli family of four.  And that doesn't count a number of other handouts Israel manages to finagle from the U.S. government -- such as a recent grant to pay for the recent resettlement of Ethiopian Jews -- or the hundreds of millions of dollars in "guilt" money extorted from West Germany each year.

Next year the toll on the U.S. Treasury will be substantially higher. Already approved by Congress and the Reagan administration for 1986 are $1.8 billion in military aid around $1.9 billion in economic aid -- both as non-repayable grants.

If the pattern of previous years is followed, however, before the year is over the Israelis will discover various additional needs, costing hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars more. Then they will ask the U.S. government for the additional money, and the government will give it to them. That's essentially the way it was with the $1.5 billion in supplementary aid for 1986 and 1986 which Congress has just voted for them.

The Reagan administration had been dragging its feet on the request for the additional $1.5 billion, telling the Israelis that they should take steps to straighten out their economy instead of always asking for more American aid when they couldn't pay their bills. The Israelis had responded with a transparent pretense of attempting to produce economic reforms, but no one was fooled by the charade; no genuine reforms, no more money, Secretary of State Schultz told the Jews in a rare effort at firmness (which didn't fool anyone either).

 "Thou shalt also suck the milk of the Gentiles." (Isaiah 60:16)
Then came Mr. Reagan's April announcement of his intention to lay a wreath in the military cemetery at Bitburg, Germany, followed by an orchestrated wailing about the "Holocaust" from Jewish groups. At the height of the wailing the White House caved in and approved the additional $1.5 billion in aid, with only a promise from Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Peres that he will tackle the problem of reforming his country's economy soon. In any event, the sort of "reforms" Mr. Peres has in mind are only cosmetic: an increase of 2 percent in Israel's value-added tax; a doubling of the tax on vacations abroad from $150 to $300; an increase in the sales tax on imported luxury items to 20 per cent.

The reason no knowledgeable observer believes that the Israelis will make any serious effort to get their finances out of the red is that they can do so only by reducing their standard of living. And why should Hymie Goldblatt deny himself the good things in life, so long as Dick Smith can be compelled to pay the bill?

The religious Jews -- the ones who take the "prophecies" and other pronouncements of the Old Testament seriously -- consider sponging off the rest of the world to be the God-given right of the Jews.1  And the secular Jews know that, so long as they can keep making the Gentile world feel guilty for the "Holocaust," they can keep gouging the suckers for more money.2

Of course, maintaining a tight grip on the Gentile world's news and entertainment media help the Jews keep the goyim in a giving mood; at least, it keeps the Gentile politicians ready to jump every time the Jews whistle. Even if Dick Smith isn't willing to help Hymie Goldblatt pay for a new Mercedes, the President, his congressman, and both his senators are more than willing to take it out of his taxes anyway; they are more afraid of incurring the wrath of the Jews than they are of losing Dick Smith's vote.

Just to keep the politicians on their toes, though, the Israelis have issued a new threat: If the Reagan administration forces the Peres administration to make any substantial reductions in the Israeli standard of living, the Israeli voters will replace Shimon Peres with Ariel Sharon as the new Prime Minister. The mere thought of having to deal with Sharon -- the ultra-arrogant, bloody-handed "Butcher of Beirut" -- gives Mr. Reagan and his aides nightmares. Sharon, on the other hand, relishes the prospect of being able to kick Gentile butts in Washington, and he criticizes Peres and the other members of the present Israeli government for not taking a tough enough line with the United States. "Unfortunately," he recently said of his colleagues, "they don't know how to face the goyim."

So long as the goyim remain such patsies, however -- plundered and betrayed by their own government, intimidated by the lie of the "Holocaust," with insufficient gumption to wrest control of their own news and entertainment industry away from its present masters, bemused by the philo-Semitic propaganda of the Judeo-Christian churches -- even the mild-mannered Peres should be able to guarantee that Israel will continue to get a free lunch, and that Dick Smith will have to pay for Hymie Goldblatt's Mercedes.

1 At the very core of Judaism is the belief that the Jews were chosen by their deity, Yahweh, to inherit the earth and all its wealth, without having to work for it. Religious Jews believe they have a covenant with Yahweh: if the Jews obey all of the commandments he has given them, then "the Lord  thy God shall...give thee great and goodly cities, which thou buildedst not, and houses full of all good things, which thou filledst not, and wells digged, which thou diggedst not, and vineyards and olive trees, which thou plantedst not...(Deuteronomy 6:10-11)

The Old Testament "prophets" are not at all bashful in reminding their fellow Jews that the divinely ordained function of the Gentiles (goyim) is to provide wealth for the Jews. Thus, "Thou shalt also suck the milk of the Gentiles." (Isaiah 60:16)

2 Although the actual number of Jews killed by the Germans during the Second World War was probably less than a million (and most of those lost their lives either by being summarily shot or by catching typhus in the concentration camps in the last months of the war, not by being "gassed"), if one accepts the claimed figure of 6,000,000 victims, then it is easy to calculate that Israel currently is collecting more than $500 in sympathy money per dead Jew per year from the Gentile world.