The Holocaust Problem

by Dr. William L. Pierce

A LOS ANGELES COUNTY Superior Court judge ruled last month that the so-called “Holocaust” — the alleged extermination of six million Jews by Germany’s National Socialist government during the Second World War — is a historical fact and “is not reasonably subject to dispute.” The ruling was the outcome of a lawsuit by a Jewish concentration camp “survivor,” Mel Mermelstein, now a successful Long Beach, Calif., businessman, against the publishers of a “revisionist” historical periodical, The Journal of Historical Review. (ILLUSTRATION: Buchenwald concentration camp, May 1945: Why were there so many “survivors,” if the German plan was to exterminate all Jews? Jews were put behind barbed wire in Germany during the Second World War for exactly the same reason Japanese were locked up in the United States: because they could not be trusted. Many American “liberators” of Germany’s concentration camp eventually reached the conclusion that the world would have been better off, however, if there had been no survivors, but few had the moral courage to say it. General George Patton was an exception. After becoming well acquainted with the nature of the people [officially called “Displaced Persons”] his troops freed from Germany’s concentration camps, he noted in his diary in September 1945: “Harrison [a U.S. State Department official] and his ilk believe that the Displaced Person is a human being, which he is not, and this applies particularly to the Jews, who are lower than animals.”)

The only real purpose of the periodical — the claims of its publishers notwithstanding — was to cast doubt on Jewish Holocaust claims, and that purpose has been reflected in the pages of each issue. As a promotional stunt The Journal of Historical Review rashly offered a $50,000 reward to anyone who could prove that a single Jew was killed in a gas chamber by the German government during the Second World War. Mermelstein accepted the challenge; sued when, he alleged, the publishers reneged on their $50,000 offer; and won his case.

Anne Frank Hoax Exposed

Clever Jew Made Millions from Dead Daughter

by Dr. William L. Pierce

TUCKED AWAY ON pages 119 and 122 of the October 6 issue of Der Spiegel, a weekly German news magazine comparable to Time or Newsweek, was a news item of considerable significance: A scientific analysis of the manuscript purported to be the original diary of Anne Frank, a Jewish girl who died in a German concentration camp during the Second World War, has revealed that the manuscript could not have been written before 1951, six years after the end of the war. (ILLUSTRATION: Anne Frank. She died of typhus in 1945 — but she didn’t write a diary.)

The significance of Der Spiegel’s revelation of this fraud is twofold. First, the printing of the story in a mass-circulation publication constitutes a major break with past treatments of similar news. The German news media, though not under the Jewish monopoly control which blights the media in this country, generally follow a pro-Jewish line, a heritage from the immediate postwar years when the Allied occupation forces gave publishing licenses only to those Germans who had proved their disloyalty to their country during the war. Consequently, most news tending to cast doubt on Jewish stories about gas chambers and the like from the World War II era has either been blacked out altogether or downplayed and given very unsympathetic treatment. The present article, though accompanied by copious apologies and held back for six months after it became news, would not have been printed at all a year or two ago.

The Jewish Problem

This anti-Jewish-immigration cartoon from Life magazine, October 5, 1911, gives a striking
reminder of how the media have changed after falling under Jewish control. The caption reads "These pills
make me grow, mother, but the more I take the worse I feel."

by Dr. William L. Pierce

FOR THE LAST three decades there has been, in this land of free speech and a free press, an almost universally observed taboo on one topic of overwhelming importance: the Jewish question. Until about the last year or two, in fact, it was hardly permissible to even hint at the existence of such an issue, much less to discuss it openly.

Now the subject has been broached, not by our own people — for whom it has the most crucial importance — but, interestingly enough, by the Jews themselves, who successfully imposed the taboo on it in the first place.

One cannot pick up a major newspaper today without reading about “the Jewish vote” in the recent Presidential election, or which candidate got the most “Jewish money,” or which senators are blocking further Russian trade agreements until the Russians make more concessions on “the Jewish issue,” and so on.

What would the Jew do without his Holocaust®?

From Brief Commentary, National Vanguard Magazine Issue No. 88, July 1982:

MURDEROUS Menachem [Begin] is in the fourth day of his newest invasion of Lebanon as this issue goes to press. Those troublesome Palestinians, who just will not let his fellow Israelis enjoy their stolen country in peace, must be taught a lesson. So his brave, Jewish stormtroopers are giving the Palestinian women and children in the Lebanese refugee camps another good taste of napalm and shrapnel.

Poor Ronnie [Reagan], who gave Menacham the napalm and the fragmentation bombs and told him for the fourteenth time that he was not to use them for aggressive purposes, like he has used all the weapons given to him earlier, is embarrassed by Menachem's latest display of contempt for his American benefactors but dares not say anything.

Never fear: the controlled media are covering for him. Interspersed with maudlin reviews of the latest "Holocaust" epic from Hollywood are headlines about how the U.S. government brought 300 Russian "Nazis" to this country after the Second World War and helped them escape their just desserts at the hands of our gallant Soviet allies for mistreating Soviet Jews. The very least the U.S. government can do to make up for that is help the Jews kill a few more Palestinians.

What would Menachem and his tribe do without the Holocaust? Why, they might be held accountable for their actions, just like ordinary people! No wonder they fly into such a rage whenever anyone questions their famous "six million" figure!

************************

"[T]hey regard each one of those 'six million' as money in the bank."

************************

For the sake of comparison, consider the case of the Mennonites, an unworldly, pacifist Christian sect, named after their 16th-century founder. Sixty years ago nearly half of the Mennonites in the world lived in Russia, and nearly all of these were systematically murdered by the Communists.

No one disputes the fact that the massacre occurred, and yet the Mennonites living today in Canada and the United States never belabor it. They are deeply concerned about starvation in Africa, and they draw back at the very thought of anti-Semitism, but they seem to feel that their own coreligionists' sufferings are but a small part of the human tragedy.

Imagine an American approaching one of these pious, humble people and saying something like, "I don't believe the Communists really killed 100,000 of your people. I think the actual number was closer to 10,000, and many of those were not actually murdered, but succumbed to starvation and typhus under Communist rule."

He would probably scratch his chin, look the American in the eye, and calmly reply: "Why, that's an interesting thought. You got anything I can read on the subject?"

One can dispute with any number of nationalities who have suffered persecution in the past, until one is blue in the face, without provoking that special wrath unleashed by the Jews on anyone who questions the highly suspect details of their own claim to martyrdom. The reason is that they regard each one of those "six million" as money in the bank.

What Mad Bomber Menachem and many of his tribe do not seem to realize, however, is that, regardless of how many of them suffered during the Second World War, their "six million" bank account is long overdrawn.
---

CANADA also has its cross to bear. May 14 of this year [1982] was the 34th anniversary of the Jews' 1948 announcement that they were taking Palestine away from the Palestinians and renaming it Israel. The Jews of Sarnia, a town of 54,000 in southwestern Ontario, asked the mayor to fly the Israeli flag in front of city hall for the day. The mayor, Marceil Saddy, who is Lebanese by birth, refused.

The Jews then demanded a special session of the City Council, at which they screamed "pig," "bigot," "racist," and "idiot" at Saddy. It took the other council members about 30 seconds to overrule Saddy, run down the Canadian flag, and run up the Israeli flag in its place.
---

The Evidence of the Prussian Blue

by Dr. William L. Pierce
From National Vanguard magazine issue No. 110, March-April 1989:

Fred Leuchter, of Boston, Massachusetts, is an engineer -- a very special sort of engineer. His specialty is the technology of putting condemned prisoners to death. He knows everything there is to know about electric chairs, gallows, and gas chambers. His consulting firm, Fred A. Leuchter Associates, is the only one of its kind in the United States, and he is the man who is called on whenever a new prison with an execution facility is built or an old one is refurbished.

One of his recent jobs was the design of a new gas chamber for the Missouri State Penitentiary, in Jefferson City. Another was a forensic examination of the alleged "gas chambers" in the former concentration camps at Auschwitz, Birkenau, and Majdanek, all in Poland, where Jews have been claiming for the last 44 years that millions of their brethren perished at the hands of the German occupying force during the Second World War.